By Chouraqui, Frank; Merleau-Ponty, Maurice; Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm
This article seeks to make contributions to the historical past of contemporary philosophy through developing a structural hyperlink among the recommendations of Friedrich Nietzsche and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. it's meant as a scientific exposition of either philosopher's key concepts, in addition to an inquiry at the origins of so-called continental philosophy.
Read or Download Ambiguity and the absolute : Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth PDF
Best epistemology books
Our wisdom of the exterior international isa compilation of lectures Bertrand Russell brought within the US during which he questions the very relevance and legitimacy of philosophy. In it he investigates the connection among ‘individual’ and ‘scientific’ wisdom and questions the ability during which now we have come to appreciate our actual global.
A suite of seminal essays within the philosophical sub-discipline of epistemology (the concept of knowledge).
This e-book provides a multidisciplinary point of view on probability, with contributions from exceptional researchers within the components of biology, cognitive neuroscience, economics, genetics, common historical past, legislations, linguistics, good judgment, mathematical physics, information, theology and philosophy. the person chapters are sure jointly through a normal advent via a gap bankruptcy that surveys 2500 years of linguistic, philosophical, and clinical reflections on likelihood, twist of fate, fortune, randomness, success and comparable options.
- Bayesian Epistemology
- Radical Hermeneutics
- What is your dangerous idea
- Handbook of Epistemology
- Truth, Knowledge and Modality (Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3)
Extra resources for Ambiguity and the absolute : Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth
Contrary to the way Heidegger and others conceive of it, Nietzsche sees Being as purely relative. Being is the very movement of truth, which ﬁnds its origin in the authentic experience of the perceptual world and leads into the inauthentic, metaphysical worldview that Nietzsche rejects. Being, in this sense, cannot be envisaged as concealed; it is the concealing itself. Being is not self-falsiﬁed; it is selffalsiﬁcation itself. Merleau-Ponty The problem: how come what is open here may be crystallised there?
In Lampert’s view, this aphorism is related not to Descartes’s cogito as presented in his Discourse and in his Second Meditation, but to his Treatise of Passions, “the book that sets forth the ﬁrst modern account of soul as an epiphenomenon of the machinery of the human body” (Lampert , n–). Unlike Lampert, it does not seem to me that in this passage Nietzsche criticizes the non-physicality of the “soul” as much as he criticizes the notion of an independent subject, incarnate or not.
Indb 18 ■ Introduction 10/15/13 8:03:05 AM also Nietzsche’s conclusion. Demonstrating this provides a satisfactory and systematic link between the two thinkers’ philosophies. The core question of this project is the question of truth, and the thesis I defend is that Merleau-Ponty and Nietzsche respond to this question in the same way. This link satisﬁes the requirement of being systematic and intrinsic because it is placed at the ontological level. This means that it is intrinsically connected with every aspect of each thinker’s worldview.